Dating methodology archaeology
The sale of such items, says Dr Saunders, has provided an important source of income ever since refugees first returned to the area after the conflict.
Archaeologists, though, regard such activities as looting.
THE first-world-war battlefields of Belgium and France are dangerous places where, even today, unexploded shells lurk, making excavation a potentially lethal activity.
But as archaeologists pick up their trowels, they must consider more than their personal safety.
In some cases, indigenous peoples and archaeologists have co-operated and reached compromises.Should battlefields be left alone as memorials, redeveloped for tourism, or preserved for the archaeologists of the future?Archaeologists increasingly consider the third option: in recent years, they have become more selective about what and where they dig, so that they do not preclude investigations by subsequent generations.demonstrated that science's authority over the dead is not absolute.However scientifically respectable their methods, archaeologists have been forced to acknowledge that they do not operate in a vacuum, and must take the values of others into account, not least because they will otherwise be denied access to important data. Dr Vitelli says that several of her students who are studying bioanthropology, which involves the examination of skeletal remains, are now questioning whether they want to continue in that field, for both ethical and practical reasons.